I am very surprised by the continuing emotionalism of the defenders of the Wren Chapel cross who are writing in to the Virginia Gazette. I am very sorry that their emotionalism causes them to be unchristian, in their personal attacks on College president Gene Nichol and even (in today's paper) his wife. For myself, I admire what Gene Nichol is doing (in many arenas, not only in this isolated instance) to make the College hospitable to students of all faiths and cultures. Indeed, as I understand it, the desire to increase that hospitality is one reason why the College's Board of Visitors brought him here.
What is it about this cross? As an object, it is entirely unremarkable. It was available through any church supply catalog. It might still be. It was the standard issue cross in many Protestant (not Catholic) churches in the middle part of the 20th century, back when altars were up against the wall. But there is something deeply symbolic about this particular cross, in this latest dispute in the culture wars. I'm not sure that I understand it. I'm not sure that the emotionalism even has anything to do with Christian faith.
I wonder if God cares about the religious symbols we have created for ourselves? Instead, I think it is our actions that please or displease God. If the College restored the cross to 24/7 display in the chapel, I suspect the defenders of the cross would think all is well with the world. In fact, of course, all would not be. Let me offer some examples of how this whole controversy entirely misses the point of what's important.
It would please God if those who are organizing candle light vigils would devote their energy to ending the tragic problem of homelessness in our community. It would please God if those attacking the integrity of Gene Nichol would turn their anger towards the fact that there are members of our community who die every day because they have had no health insurance and thus have received no preventitive medical care. It would please God if the energy being expended in defense of the cross were used to set up a community-wide visitation program so that no member of our community would be isolated and lonely. It would please God if all that energy would be used to solve the problem of minority children underachieving in school.
All of that would be following the example of Jesus, who was only following the example of the Old Testament prophets. In many places in the Bible, we see that those prophets and Jesus attacked those who revered religious symbols, but did not take care of the poor. I think God cares about people, not symbols.

