Got in last night (or actually this morning) at 2:30, after watching the Phillies play the Nationals, and then driving home from DC. A thoroughly enjoyable experience of spending time with my son, Nathan, and of a Phillies victory! (They started Adam Eaton who has the worst earned run average of any starter in the league. He's being paid $8 million this season, in the first year of a three-year, $24 million contract, to be the worst starter in the league. But the Phillies' pitching is so atrocious that they have to keep running him out there. (Plus they're paying him all that money.) Last night Eaton got into the sixth inning, but only once did he retire the side in order. The rest of the time he was surrendering up hits and walks and giving up a run here and there and barely getting out of jams without major damage. When he walked the first batter he faced in the sixth, "Uncle" Charlie Manual, the Phils' manager, had seen enough. He immediately walked to the mound and yanked him. By that point, Eaton had given up three runs, the Phillies were up 6-3, and for the rest of the game the bullpen pitchers came in and threw strikes and got outs! What a joyous surprise! An entirely atypical performance by the Phillies bullpen.
Some Philadelphia sportswriters have taken to calling Charlie Manual "Uncle Charlie." He's 63, white haired and overweight (they shouldn't make men like that wear baseball uniforms!), and has been a player, coach or manager since he could walk. He's from Buena Vista, VA, and he talks like it too. He was mercilessly derided his first two years in Philadelphia (much of it was because of his accent and anti-southerner bigotry), and at the beginning of this year. But this year the Phillies have suffered devastating injuries, especially to pitchers, and Uncle Charlie still has them right behind the Mets, who are just barely leading the National League East. Now Philadelphians are talking about how Uncle Charlie should be Manager of the Year! Baseball's a funny, fascinating game.
Last night was the third-to-last game at old RFK Stadium in DC. Next year the Nationals will be in their brand new, $600 million ballpark. I'll be sorry to see RFK Stadium go. It's a dark, dingy dump, but even the cheap seats are close to the field because the upper decks are pitched so steeply. It's a great place to watch a game. I've seen two games there since the Nationals became the DC franchise, and I'm glad I've gotten to spend time in the ballpark. It was built in 1962, and I well remember riding past it on the Washington-Baltimore Parkway as a boy, on our trips between Delaware and South Carolina two or three time a year to visit family. I remember thinking, "Wow! That's where the Senators play!" The Senators were an awful, awful team -- but they held a fascination for me because they played in the American League, and that was exotic. I had only been to games in Philadelphia, which was (an is) in the National League. It wasn't until I was in seminary, in Chicago, that I went to an American League game. Since I lived on the south side, I had to be a White Sox fan and I was at old Comisky Park 50 times, I'll bet, during the three years I was in Chicago. (I spent every afternoon (in those days) at Wrigley Field when the Phillies were in town against the Cubs, to see National League games.) The leagues were so different back then. The National League emphasized pitching and speed and bunts and manufacturing runs; there was only the occasional dominating home run hitter. The American League style of play was to get a couple of guys on and look for a three-run homer. Now, of course, they both play the same style of game: long ball. Much of that is because all of the new ballparks (with the exception of San Diego and Detroit) are band boxes. And inter-league play and inter-league trading means that the two leagues aren't so distinct from each other. It's taken something away from the game.
The only difficult and unpleasant thing about last night was getting out of the parking garage at the Springfield-Franconia metro stop! (We drove that far and rode the train to the ballpark.) We'd done that before, but the parking garage machines are different now. The signs at the parking garage warned us to put enough money on our "Smart Cards" to pay for parking when we were ready to leave, so I added the extra $3.75 when I bought my metro ticket at the machine in the station. (There's no one there to take money.) But when I got to the exit booth in the parking garage (where, again, there was no one to take money), there was a place to scan a Smart Card -- but that is obviously something different from a metro ticket, because there was no place to insert what I was holding in my hand. And traffic was backing up. I had no idea what to do. Nathan thought more quickly than me. He noticed a credit card swipe, and handed me his card. So the gate raised to let us out of the garage. I said, "This is like being in a totally different culture! I'm going to be glad to get back to where it is still Virginia."
Anybody want a DC metro card with $3.75 of value? It's sitting on my dresser!

