Both newspapers that arrived at our house this morning carried the same lead headline: General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner has been forced out, as a condition of GM receiving more federal bailout money. The attempt is to shake up the corporate culture of GM. The hope is that GM can re-make itself ...
... into a company like Tesla Motors. Tesla Motors is a Silicon Valley start-up company that today has a next-generation electric car ready for production. The barrier is that they do not have the capital to begin production. (There are two other Silicon Valley companies very close to unveiling their own version of a next-generation electric car.) One wonders: should more federal bailout money go to GM at all? Or should we be accelerating the work of car companies that are already next-generation?
I've been wondering lately: does the Church have any greater chance of re-inventing itself to meet the needs of the future as does GM? (There are striking personnel parallels at both institutions: Alban Institute consultant Ed White forecasts, that in 10 years, staff at national Protestant denominational offices will be half or even one-third what they are now -- because innovation is now taking place at the local, congregational level, and the ponderous national structure is being left behind.)
I'm thinking of various ways that the church will have to re-invent itself before it will be interesting to many of those who are now in their 20s and 30s. The hardest thing will be to think in entirely new ways!
Let me think out loud of examples:
A building is not the church. A building is the house for the church. The church assembles on Sunday mornings and at other times of the week for worship and study and fellowship. The church is the people who comprise the Body of Christ in a local area. (So: We don't "go to church." We gather as church. No more throw-away comments such as I heard just a moment ago: "I can't say that. I'm in church.")
One thing that is obviously on the way out is the "membership" model of a congregation, for several reasons, at least:
1. It scares away many who are in their 20s and 30s, who see themselves to be on the journey of faith, but who aren't at all interested in the maintenance of an institution -- which requires committee meetings, reports, etc.
2. For all ages, the membership model is consumeristic. I join a "church," the same way I become a member of a club. I expect worship services and music and chaplaincy services that meet my needs. If the "church" doesn't meet my needs, then I find one that will. If there are people in the "church" who are doing something I don't agree with or that makes me uncomfortable, then I'll look for a "church" that makes me feel comfortable.
3. It's passive. I watch, while the paid staff does the work. (What a joy it is to be pastor at St. Stephen, where this is
much less of a reality than at other congregations I have served and know of!)
A most succinct statement of a new way of thinking comes from Bryan Stone in his book,
Evangelism after Christendom: “Salvation is impossible apart from the church, not because the church has received salvation as a possession and is now in a position to dispense it to or withhold it from others. It is instead because salvation is, in the first place, a distinct form of social existence. To be saved is to be made part of a new people and a new politics, the body of Christ.” (page 188)
So -- we assemble, as church, so that the Spirit can form us in the faith, so that we come to live in the resurrection. What does that look like? It's described by such passages as Galatians 5:22-23: "the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control." Here’s another description, again from Paul: "As God's chosen ones, holy and beloved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience. Bear with one another and, if anyone has a complaint against another, forgive each other; just as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive." (Colossians 3:12-13)
(Note well: "meekness" means resisting retaliation. It means finding ways of fighting violence without resorting to violence. It takes tremendous courage and discipline to be meek!)
The assumption is that such a radical re-orientation of life is impossible for an individual to achieve on his own. Community is necessary -- the community of the church, those on the journey together, offering mutual support, nurture, challenge, accountability.
The Christian life is not primarily subscribing to a set of beliefs. The Christian life is just that: a way of life, in the community described just above. It is supported by beliefs, certainly. But it is seen in the actual living, as described three paragraphs above. And it is a way of living for the world that God has created! That's our mission as church.
So -- a first draft. A new way of thinking.
(I call it that. But, of course, this is simply a return to the way of thinking among followers of Jesus during the first centuries of the Jesus movement -- before the Constantinian establishment of the church as an institution.)